Hip Resurfacing Vs Hip Replacement 2016

This article talks about some of the major differences between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.

Hip resurfacing vs hip replacement 2016.

Hip resurfacing a procedure that improves the function of your own hip joint may be a viable alternative to total hip replacement surgery. Hip resurfacing is an alternative technology to total hip replacement that is aimed at treating painful conditions of the hip in younger active patients. The birmingham hip resurfacing is the answer to younger patients with severe hip pain due to arthritis. Hip replacement alleviates pain by removing the affected bones and cartilage and replacing it with a prosthetic implant that imitates the function of the joint.

Since its fda approval in 2006 more than 3 000 hip. In a conventional hip replacement the pain from a diseased hip is relieved by replacing the ball and the socket. Importantly hip resurfacing needn t be looked at as a temporary procedure inevitably leading to hip replacement down the road. Results from long term data show that it can last just as long or longer than traditional hip replacement in young high demand patients especially men.

Unlike traditional hip replacement surgery resurfacing does not remove as much of your leg bone. How does it compare to conventional hip replacement. Hip resurfacing is a less invasive form of joint replacement surgery which is advised to only selected individuals.